Texas Board Of Education STILL Trying to Screw Science- Language ChangesSomervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


Salon is now an archive. New site here
This site's archives
 

Texas Board Of Education STILL Trying to Screw Science- Language Changes
 


25 January 2009 at 12:10:01 PM
salon

Should have guessed that the SBOE is still trying to foist ignorance and superstition on children in science classes. People don't like the "strengths and weaknesses" language? We'll just change it to say "sufficient or insufficient"  From airtightnoodle

Also added to the proposed standards by board Chairman Don McLeroy, R-Bryan, is an amendment that directs science teachers and students to “describe the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry to explain the sudden appearance, stasis and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record.”

Here's from the Houston Chronicle.

Texas schools won’t have to teach the weaknesses of evolution theories anymore, but the State Board of Education ushered in other proposed changes Friday that some scientists say still undermine evolution instruction and subject the state to ridicule.

The new proposals came just one day after the board — in a move celebrated by many scientists — narrowly agreed to delete a provision in current curriculum standards that requires teachers to instruct students in weaknesses and strengths of evolution theory...

Also added to the proposed standards by board Chairman Don McLeroy, R-Bryan, is an amendment that directs science teachers and students to “describe the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry to explain the sudden appearance, stasis and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record.”

They are asking students to explain something that does not exist, said David Hillis, a biology professor at the University of Texas at Austin and MacArthur Foundation “genius award” winner.

“This new proposed language is absurd. It shows very clearly why the board should not be rewriting the science standards, especially when they introduce new language that has not even been reviewed by a single science expert,” Hillis said.

It's pretty astonishing that the SBOE is ignoring science standards (and particularly when they don't really understand what they're alleging themselves). I'm with Peter Stern when he says that the SBOE should be abolished.

Incidentally, I'm mid-way through reading the book "Forty Days and Forty Nights" about the kitzmiller/Dover trials and it is just an excellent run through of the arguments and fallacies of intelligent design and the real attempts to be deceptive to shoehorn it into public education.


Permalink Tags:          
     Views: 2590 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Obama's WH Science Advisor Deplores Texas Science Standards
And MORE Audio from the Texas State BOE Science TEKS in November 2008
Continuing Audio Snippets from Texas SBOE Science TEKS Hearing in November 2008
On Teaching Creationism Along with Evolution in Public Schools.
Somervell County Salon Blog is now an archive site. Commenting not enabled.

Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Thursday, January 22, 2026






Latest Posts

More Blog Headlines