Sarah Palin now refuses to submit to questioning unless it's IN FRONT OF A PANEL COMPRISED OF THREE PEOPLE SHE APPOINTED. How crooked is that? So much for full cooperation with the probe.

Course we already know she lied about what she did to her ex-brother in law and had to backtrack (read: TELL THE TRUTH, atleast part of it) when some tapes of her talking surfaced.

Frank Bailey, a member of Palin's administration, was caught on tape in August 2008 on a phone call with another trooper in which he questioned why Wooten was still on staff, seemingly speaking on behalf of Palin. The release of this tape proved embarrassing for Palin, who was forced to backtrack on her earlier statements, in which she had maintained neither she, nor her family, nor staff, ever pressured Monegan or anyone else to fire Wooten.

Bailey was put on paid leave from the administration following the release of that tape.

Since becoming the VP nominee, Palin has challenged jurisdiction of the ethics investigation. Bailey cites that jurisdictional uncertainty as his reason for not testifying.

I'm sure Repubilcans have no problems with her being unethical-that's the type of values politician they like to elect!