Does John *100 Years More in Iraq* McCain Agree With Bush's Signing Statement on Permanent Bases? Somervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


Salon is now an archive. New site here
This site's archives
 

Does John *100 Years More in Iraq* McCain Agree With Bush's Signing Statement on Permanent Bases?
 


2 February 2008 at 11:13:12 AM
salon

I was really surprised when  I read, after the NH primary, that some people voted for John McCain because they thought he was anti-war. HUH??????? Talk about people paying NO attention.

But what's John McCain's position on the president's thumbing of his nose about Congress?

In a statement, Sen. Joe Biden, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Bush’s signing statement “outrageous” and constitutionally questionable:

It is outrageous for the President to suggest that Congress cannot bar the use of funds — something clearly within the power of Congress under our Constitution — for the construction of permanent bases in Iraq.

Conspicuously absent from the debate over Bush’s signing statement is Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). In the past, McCain has spoken out aggressively against signing statements, saying they are “wrong” and that they “should not be done“:

“I would never issue a signing statement,” the Arizona senator said at a Rotary Club meeting in Nashua, adding that he “would only sign it or veto” any legislation that reached his desk as president.

Perhaps McCain is keeping silent because he shares Bush’s goal of an indefinite, long-term presence of American troops in Iraq. Last month, McCain said it would be “fine with” him “if we maintain a presence in” Iraq for “a hundred” years.


Permalink
     Views: 2514 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019
Somervell County Salon Blog is now an archive site. Commenting not enabled.

Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Sunday, November 16, 2025






Latest Posts

More Blog Headlines