Politico

"The privacy interests at stake are high because the government's criminal investigation through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and confidential," U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in an order issued Tuesday.

In the order, Sullivan declined to make Pagliano's immunity agreement public. The judge ordered the deal be submitted to the court so he could assess Pagliano's plan to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a planned deposition of Pagliano in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related to Clinton's emails.

Gee, is it any surprise that Clinton and her camp lied about this calling it a *security review*? Bullchit. Reminder that this is what James Comey said a short time ago.

Even though Hillary Clinton has repeatedly described the FBI probe over her use of a private email server as a "security inquiry," FBI Director James Comey today questioned the use of that phrase.

“I don’t know what that means," Comey told reporters today in Washington, D.C. "We’re conducting an investigation. That’s the bureau’s business. That’s what we do."

One reporter noted that former Secretary of State Clinton often refers to it as a "security inquiry."

The word "investigation" -- "it’s in our name,” Comey responded. “And I’m not familiar with the term ‘security inquiry.’”

In the past several months, Comey has repeatedly referred to this probe as an "investigation," including in a legal document filed in a freedom of information lawsuit related to her email case, related to Clinton's use of a private email server for official communication during her tenure as secretary of state.

As usual, going to remind that I have ALWAYS voted as a Democrat, have NEVER voted for a Republican in my entire life, but will NOT vote for Hillary Clinton. I voted 2 x for Obama and am disappointed that he endorsed a candidate who is under criminal investigation. I'm still for Bernie Sanders, although, frankly, I"m about done with the Democratic party, since so many of the current platforms don't seem much different than Republican agendas.