Salon is now an archive.
New site here
This site's archives
13 July 2015 at 9:19:18 AM
salon
I've long believed that the "All men are created equal" part of the Declaration of Independence was a lie, at least in the initial inception. Women, for example, were not included in the freedoms that men could enjoy. Nor were black people. And here's one I somehow skipped over, but a native American did not.
Powerful words, indeed, and ones we should hold dear no matter where we are from or live. But if one reads through the document completely – as it's done annually and publicly in countless U.S. locations – it lists “repeated injuries and usurpations” and “tyranny” acts against the colonialists on behalf of King George III of Great Britain.The second paragraph concludes, “To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world,” before a list of 27 sentences listing various trangressions from tax complaints to forced military conscription.
The last of these complaints, however, is one that reads: He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
Pause right there. Does the most famous document in American history really state “all Men are created equal,” then hypocritically proclaim right afterward its first inhabitants are “merciless Indian savages”?
Yes, it really does, and this founding document was more than just a document written in the context of a bitter conflict. Consider, although Jefferson is most credited for penning this famous document, it was written by a committee of 5 people – including Benjamin Franklin and John Adams – and ratified 86 times by the Continental Congress before becoming official and signed. So this was a carefully mulled over phrase in that Natives would forever be considered “savages” in regards to their future relations with the U.S.
It's tough to take the opinions of those deemed a lesser “merciless Indian savage” serious, apparently—much less honor their treaty rights. When the brutal history and unfair treatment of Natives is brought up in the Redskins controversy, it seemingly elevates patronizing attitudes toward American Indians' arguments. “Just get over it,” is a dismissive phrase frequently said. But how can American Indians simply “get over it” when the primary founding document of the U.S. still condescendingly refers to them as a “savage” to this day?
When seen in this context, and along with the other groups left out of the Declaration, it seems that initially the Declaration was written for rich white men, and only over a couple of centuries has become inclusive of all. I believe this is mostly due to court battles rather than legislature, and that there is a lot of work yet to be done by those who want to be seen, as part of our shared history, as also enjoying those freedoms, and respected as full American citizens.
Permalink
Tags:
indian savages
declaration of independence
Views: 2588
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Exposing Lie that President Obama won't say word *Creator* when citing declaration
| |
Somervell County Salon Blog is now an archive site. Commenting
not enabled.
|
Click Here
for Main Page
Guest
Today Is
Thursday, June 11, 2026

Latest Posts
More Blog
Headlines
|
|