Hormones in My Butter! Hormones in my Milk! What the Fool! Somervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


Hormones in My Butter! Hormones in my Milk! What the Fool!

11 August 2008 at 2:45:47 PM

Just came back from David\'s grocery. I needed some butter and was looking for my usual Land O Lakes when I saw "Challenge Butter- from Cows NOT TREATED with the Growth Hormone rbST". The price was the same as for the other butters, above. Naturally, I thought, well,heck, does this mean that Land O Lakes IS treated with rbST? I also was a little surprised to see this butter in Glen Rose, and now I wonder, where\'s the milk without the hormones? (I heard that HEB may be selling non-rbST milk but I didn\'t see any in the Stephenville HEB last time I looked).

I didn\'t really know much about rbST except that I don\'t like the idea of having milk produced by jacking up cows artificially to produce more. So here\'s a little of what I found out.

First off, Monsanto appears to be behind not only one of the products, Posilac, that increases milk production in cows, BUT as of August, 2008 is getting out of the business. From unbossed.

Monsanto Company announced today that it is pursuing a divestiture of its dairy product, POSILAC(R) bovine somatotropin, in the upcoming months. Additional details have not been disclosed at this time.

"While POSILAC is a strong product for the business, we believe repositioning the business with a strategic owner will allow Monsanto to focus on the growth of its core seeds and traits business while ensuring that loyal dairy farmers continue to receive the value of POSILAC in their operations," said Carl Casale, Monsanto\'s Executive Vice-President of Strategy and Operations.

Monsanto\'s announcement is directed at buyers - telling them that Posilac is just the bestest product on the market, but, well, Monsanto needs to spend more time with its seeds.

Why might that be? Seems that their attempts at PR propaganda to get consumers to stop asking both IF the dairy product has rbST and to quit wanting to buy NON-rbST products wasn\'t doing so well. Monsanto tried to say that, despite the risk not only to cows from using this product but also to pregnant women, Hey! It Decreases Global Warming! We Have a Study! Problem is that the stury was done (impartially? No) by people directly on Monsanto\'s payroll or through its funding.

There is currently a debate raging over the safety of bovine growth hormone. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993 ruled that it was not harmful and could be injected into cows to improve their milk production. But some studies have linked it with a risk of mastitis (udder infection) in cows, requiring the use of antibiotics that may in turn be contributing to the evolving resistance of bacteria to the drugs.

Bovine growth hormone is also known to stimulate the production of insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF1) by the liver; some studies have shown that high levels of IGF1 in the bloodstream may heighten the risk of prostate and breast cancers as well as a woman\'s chance of conceiving twins. As a result of consumer concerns, farmers in Australia, Canada, the European Union and New Zealand do not inject their cows with bovine growth hormone.

Oh, that\'s what every woman wants. To be drinking her milk and popping out TWINS. With breast cancer.

Monsanto is currently in the midst of a fight in the U.S. to prevent dairy farmers from labeling their milk as rbST-free or as produced by cows not treated with bovine growth hormone. The company charges that such claims cannot be verified, because there is no inexpensive test to prove that cow milk is free of artificial hormones. At Monsanto\'s request, several states are weighing new regulations barring such labeling, even though the FDA last year ruled that such labels are neither false or misleading.

Many U.S. dairy farmers have pledged not to use the growth hormone in their products, and corporate milk consumers such as Kraft Foods and retailers such as Wal-Mart have announced plans to shift to dairy products that do not contain artificial hormones.

The American Journal of Dietetic Association did a story that came out in July 2008 that basically says that all milk is the same, whether the cows used rbST or not. Not surprising that such a study would come out when Monsanto has been on a tear to get national and state agencies to quit food labeling that products are rbST free (after all, that would hurt their profits or at least it WOULD have if they weren\'t divesting themselves of posilac). Here\'s a link to a PDF of the study. And here are the people who did the study.





Let\'s see. The first guy, John Vincini works for..... wait for it.... .MONSANTO! Second guy, Terry Etherton appears to be a partisan for Monsanto. Should I guess that Penny Kris-Etherton is his wife?  Michael McGrath works for Monsanto. Steven Denham worked for Monsanto. Daniel Goldstein works for.... are you getting sleepy yet? Monsanto. Matthew Lucy had grant from....

The whattoeat blog makes a point about what was not measured

What’s not measured in this report should be jumping off the page to any critcal thinker:
IGF; antibiotic use (which residues tested for and which not); somatic cell count; CLA; pasture time; omega 3 fatty acids; vitamin E; life expectancy of
the cow, etc. etc.

For me, I\'m not a scientist, but any time I see a study, even if it\'s published in some *prestigious* journal but it\'s FUNDED by a particular company, I\'m going to think they have a point of view to put forward and want some scientific study to help polish it up. However, Monsanto is pulling out of that drug for cows. Methinks they know they\'re losing the argument.

UPDATE April 13,2010-Saw this HuffPo article about the dangers of rBGH milk. And, ugh, it includes some stats about meat

US cattle are implanted with natural or synthetic sex hormones prior to entering feed lots 100 days prior to slaughter in order to increase their meat yield. Not surprisingly, our meat is contaminated with high levels of sex hormones. Based on these concerns, and as warned by the Cancer Prevention Coalition and five leading national experts, our meat poses increased risks of hormonal cancers, which have escalated since 1975: breast by 23 percent, prostate by 60 percent, and testis by 60 percent. Not surprisingly, US meat is banned worldwide.

Furthermore, as clearly evidenced in a series of General Accounting Office investigations and Congressional hearings, the FDA, besides the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), have failed to take any regulatory action to protect the public from the dangers of hormonal meat. A 1986 report, "Human Food Safety and Regulation of Animal Drugs," unanimously approved by the House Committee on Government Operations, concluded that the "FDA has consistently disregarded its responsibility -- has repeatedly put what it perceives are interests of veterinarians and the livestock industry ahead of its legal obligation to protect consumers -- jeopardizing the health and safety of consumers meat, milk, and poultry."

Permalink Tags:          
     Views: 12909 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Last Show Tonight on SLAPP Suits
1 - thank you for writing about this.   10 Sep 2008 @ 5:12:49 PM 

Keep up the good fight!  We have got to make people aware.  Thank you for doing your part!


2 - salon   10 Sep 2008 @ 5:27:13 PM 

Some days it really annoys me that I can't just take things at face value but have to look up what's behind various actions. heh. I went to the Stephenville, Texas HEB and found that they sell milk without the hormones. So that's where I go.

Latest Blog Post by salon -Last Show Tonight on SLAPP Suits
3 - humanbeing   10 Sep 2008 @ 9:53:15 PM 

 Something we need to pay more attention to...our food sources are becoming very corrupted. Check out Michael Pollan's books, such as The Omnivore's Dilemma. You'll never eat meat again.

An idea I would like our community and local government to consider is turning some of our city and county spaces into communal vegetable gardens. Obviously, this would require major committment. Ideas?

Latest Blog Post by humanbeing -State Department Admits It Doesn't Know Keystone XL's Exact Route
4 - canadian   24 Sep 2008 @ 11:56:35 AM 

i am on shock that usa let that

its illegal in canada


5 - salon   24 Sep 2008 @ 12:11:06 PM 

Canadian-you must not have Monsanto dictating your farm life-:)

Latest Blog Post by salon -Last Show Tonight on SLAPP Suits
6 - David Golliath   24 Sep 2011 @ 11:41:15 AM 

Dr.Chiv Chopra is an ex Health Canada employee who blew the whisltle on monsanto trying to use bovine growth hormones in milk entering canada from the united states. His lab tests showed the hormone was responsible for causing cancer tumors in a majority of lab rats eventually killing them.

He refused to allow this milk or any products containing the hormone to cross the Border

He was fired along with three other co-workers for releasing information that monsanto would have prefered remained secret.

This is the guy canadians trusted to keep there countries food free from poison


 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting

Click Here for Main Page

Today Is  
Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Latest Posts

Last Show Tonight on SLAPP Suits
salon 11/11/2019

Louis Vuitton Artistic Director Calls Trump a Total Joke (Keene, Texas)
salon 10/22/2019

Here's Creep Trump Giving the Finger to Female Astronauts
salon 10/22/2019

Impeaching Trump- Is it acceptable for a president to pressure a foreign.....
salon 10/22/2019

Why are Paul Manafort's defense attorneys helping Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman today?
salon 10/10/2019

Money Laundering 101- Trump seeks to get rid of regulations on offshore money
salon 10/10/2019

More Blog Headlines


salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS