When both Democrats AND Republicans Gut the Constitution, What's the Difference? Somervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


 

When both Democrats AND Republicans Gut the Constitution, What's the Difference?
 


19 October 2007 at 9:50:37 AM
salon

I've been ANGRY about Bush's illegal spying on Americans for a long time, ANGRY about Congress passing that abysmal bill before their, um, VACAY, in August that urinated on the 4th amendment, and ANGRY that the Senate Democrats would even, for one second, consider a bill that gave immunity to the telecom companies that were accessories to Bush's crime. (If this were in Nixon's administration, Bush ... would... have... been... impeached!) But not only have the Senate Democrats decided to give the telecoms immunity, they have also decided that the Attorney General is the one to oversee the programs. Right. I also read yesterday that the guy who the Senate is deciding upon doesn't know if waterboarding is torture or not (what's the difference between him and Alberto *I Heart Torture* Gonzales if he can't stand UP against the evil of torture!)

The Senate Intelligence Committee voted Thursday night to approve compromise legislation that would strengthen court oversight of eavesdropping on Americans while granting telephone and Internet companies legal immunity for their role in assisting government surveillance programs since 2001.

After nearly five hours of closed discussions, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, the Democratic chairman, and Senator Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, the Republican vice chairman, emerged to announce that the measure had been approved in a 13-to-2 vote.

“There were substantial compromises on the part of all members and, frankly, of the administration,” Mr. Rockefeller said of the measure, which would expire in six years. Two Democratic senators, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Ron Wyden of Oregon, cast the no votes.

You know what also gets me about this? The Dems (and that includes Patrick Leahy, who I've decided is just a huge gas bag) aren't even waiting to see IF they can find out what they're frigging granting immunity to the telecoms for! Bush won't tell them. Rockefeller already said recently he wasn't even briefed, like the Bush administration LIED and said he was-so what's going on? Are they afraid they'll lose their telecom money gravy train? Are they being blackmailed? Or are they just all the same party, too, as the Republicans, the CORPORATE GRAVYTRAIN party.  

It isn't like I haven't called everyone that is my rep at the national level... repeatedly. That includes John Cornyn and KBH, even though I know they love torture and, weak sisters that they both are, are all for Bush spying on Americans. Heck, KBH even said at one point she had no problem with perjury. And Chet Edwards, who is always really quick to tell people he's NOT a Blue Dog and is Independent, even though he's registered with the Democratic party, is one of the ones that voted this last August for Bush's spying because, in his view, JUST LIKE THE REPUBLICANS, security trumps the constitution.

Yes, I'll make a round of calling again today now that I read that the Senate Intelligence Committee, which of course includes Democrats has decided to include immunity for the telecoms. What, are they all friggin in the POCKET of Big Business?

I know that there are some Democrats who vigorously fight against these types of things and that includes, last night, Ron Wyden and Russ Feingold. But here's the point-when the LEADERSHIP of a party goes along with Republicans, who in my view are weak, chickenhawk scaredy-cats, then functionally there is no difference between them.

Oh, that is, if you care about the constitution.

I'd like to see Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid DUMPED. Or maybe it's me that just needs to get with the program, realize that both parties are corrupt as heck, self-serving, do NOT want to uphold the Constitution they were sworn to protect, and don't deserve respect any more.


Permalink
     Views: 623 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



     

Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Latest Posts


Paul Harper offered to settle State of Texas ex rel. Best v Harper lawsuit for $68k back in 2016
pharper 12/29/2019 Views 688



Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019

salon 12/23/2019 Views 715



Top 100 Posts on Somervell County Salon for 2019

salon 12/22/2019 Views 519



Plans for Somervell County Salon Blog for 2020
salon 12/22/2019 Views 417



Imagine you were called up for jury duty and some people said they'd already made up their mind
salon 12/22/2019 Views 437



National Review on Removing Trump from Office (12/2019)
salon 12/22/2019 Views 432


More Blog Headlines








 



Comments

salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )





Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS