Huh. Morning-After Pills TERMINATE Or PREVENT Pregnancy- Lawsuit Questioned and DismissedSomervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


 

Huh. Morning-After Pills TERMINATE Or PREVENT Pregnancy- Lawsuit Questioned and Dismissed
 


15 October 2007 at 12:49:28 PM
salon

Couple of interesting things in this law discussion-one, whether a morning after pill that prevents *implantation* from taking place ought to be considered on the same scale as abortion, and second, whether parents should have a constitutional right to be notified if their daughters get contaception. The court threw out the lawsuit.

 

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed a federal lawsuit brought by the parents of a 16-year-old girl, on their own and on their daughter's behalf, against the city of Philadelphia and its agents, including a health center operated by the city's Department of Health. The plaintiffs in Anspach v. City of Philadelphia alleged that at the girl's request, the health center gave her a "morning after" pill, but without notifying her parents and without informing her that the medication could prevent a fertilized egg from implanting inside her uterus. Her parents contend that this information would have been of great significance to all three of them, because the prevention of implantation constitutes an abortion according to their religious beliefs.

As I will explain, this case was rightly dismissed. It nonetheless raises a question of potentially great significance: When does pregnancy begin? The answer to this question will determine whether courts should classify the morning-after-pill as preventing, or as terminating, a pregnancy. Moreover, to the extent that the U.S. Supreme Court has become more receptive to government restrictions of abortion, the official point at which pregnancy begins could prove crucial in defining the scope of women's continuing reproductive autonomy.

I've said here before that it is only in the last 30 years or so that a law that required a wife to get permission from her husband to take contraceptives was changed. I thought women had already won the argument that THEY get to decide about their bodies (ala Our Bodies Our Selves) instead of men. So it's almost unbelievable to me that there would be anyone who would plead a case that a contraceptive that prevents pregnancy should be outlawed or in any fashion equated with an abortion.


Permalink
     Views: 679 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



     

Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Monday, January 20, 2020

Latest Posts


Paul Harper offered to settle State of Texas ex rel. Best v Harper lawsuit for $68k back in 2016
pharper 12/29/2019 Views 548



Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019

salon 12/23/2019 Views 574



Top 100 Posts on Somervell County Salon for 2019

salon 12/22/2019 Views 389



Plans for Somervell County Salon Blog for 2020
salon 12/22/2019 Views 301



Imagine you were called up for jury duty and some people said they'd already made up their mind
salon 12/22/2019 Views 315



National Review on Removing Trump from Office (12/2019)
salon 12/22/2019 Views 307


More Blog Headlines








 



Comments

salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )





Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS