Bush Administration Flouts SEC decision to let shareholders SUE Wall Street Banks for Enron damagesSomervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


Bush Administration Flouts SEC decision to let shareholders SUE Wall Street Banks for Enron damages

12 June 2007 at 4:32:40 AM

Everyone knows that some investment banks, including Merrill Lynch, Barclays, and Credit Suisse Group helped Enron commit fraud against shareholders. The question is, should shareholders be able to sue and collect damages from those same entities that were accomplices in the crime? The SEC, after in investigation, voted to ask that the Solicitor General Paul Clement file on behalf of the investors in a related case that's before the Supreme Court; Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta and Motorola, 06-43..

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox has sided with Democratic commissioners and voted to weigh in on the side of investors in a Supreme Court case, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The 3-2 vote means that the agency is recommending that the U.S. Solicitor General's office advocate on behalf of investors in a case about whether third parties can be sued under federal securities laws for allegedly participating in another company's accounting fraud. That brief is due on Monday.

So what's the stance of the Bush administration?  To heck with shareholders and a blind eye to the complicity of the bankers that helped Enron pull off its scam.

The Bush administration rejected a Securities and Exchange Commission recommendation in a key Supreme Court case and did not support shareholders suing Wall Street banks for damages over Enron's collapse.

The Justice Department's solicitor general, who represents the administration in Supreme Court cases, did not file a friend-of-the-court brief by Monday's deadline....

Dan Newman, a spokesman for Enron plaintiffs' law firm Lerach Coughlin, called the administration's stance "an unprecedented example of politics trumping the rule of law, a crass slap in the face to (SEC Chairman Christopher) Cox and the Enron victims from the hyperpolitical Bush Justice Department."

Why does the Stoneridge case matter?

Along with the possibility that it could be considered in tandem with the Enron case, legal experts consider the StoneRidge hearing important because it gives the Securities and Exchange Commission a public forum for siding with either business or investors in these types of cases. The SEC has until June 11 to file an amicus brief on behalf of the plaintiffs and address the issue of scheme liability. The commission last addressed the question nearly three years ago when it filed a "friend of the court" opinion on the side of Homestore shareholders in Simpson v. AOL with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

At the time, the commission argued against a lower court ruling that said aiding and abetting manipulative or deceptive behavior is not in itself enough to classify a company as a primary violator of Rule 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1935. The SEC asserted that a third party can be considered a primary violator if it "engages with the corporation in a transaction whose principal purpose and effect is to create a false appearance of revenues, intending to deceive investors in the corporation's stock."

The Ninth Circuit's decision to dismiss the case went against the plaintiffs and added to the confusion about when secondary actors could be held liable. "There is clearly a split in the circuit courts on when you can draw the line between primary liability and aiding and abetting," says Herbert Washer, a partner at Shearman & Sterling, which represents Merrill Lynch in the Enron case. The Ninth Circuit's opinion went beyond the scope of how the Supreme Court and other courts have defined what is considered a manipulative and deceptive act, he adds.

Companies that had a hand in creating the fraud, rather than just knowing about the violation, should be held liable, says Donald Langevoort, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, who is considering submitting an amicus brief with other law professors in the StoneRidge case. Langevoort and other securities-law experts are hoping for a bright-line rule to come out of the StoneRidge case, which could happen if it is linked with the Enron case. Otherwise the question before the court would be too narrow and "we will have more years of uncertainty in litigation," he says.

     Views: 763 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Trump Snorting Adderroll -Podcast interview with Noel Casler who worked on The Apprentice

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting

Click Here for Main Page

Today Is  
Thursday, September 19, 2019

Latest Posts

Trump Snorting Adderroll -Podcast interview with Noel Casler who worked on The Apprentice
salon 9/19/2019

Time to Lock Up Ivanka Trump? She used a personal email account to send govt emails
salon 9/18/2019

Corey Lewandowski Is Just a Flat Out Liar
salon 9/18/2019

Not Ever Voting for Unethical Trump-but I'm not a fan of Biden
salon 9/15/2019

New in Trump's Swampy Government- Emuluments Case Back On
salon 9/15/2019

At what point will this country make sure our elected officials pass gun laws to ensure human safety?
salon 9/15/2019

More Blog Headlines


salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS