Final Judgment in State of Texas ex Rel Best v Harper - 9/10/2019 Somervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


 

Final Judgment in State of Texas ex Rel Best v Harper - 9/10/2019
 


10 September 2019 at 7:26:44 PM
salon

PDF 

CAUSE NO. CI0369

THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL.
GEORGE DARRELL BEST,
Plaintiff,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
V. SOMERVELL COUNTY, TEXAS
PAUL REED HARPER,
Defendant.
 249TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FINAL JUDGMENT


On August 20, 2019, this case was called for trial before the Court. The State of Texas (the
"State") appeared through its counsel and through its representative and announced ready for trial.
George Darrell Best ("Best") received timely and proper notice of the trial date and did not appear.
Defendant Paul Reed Harper appeared through his counsel and in person and announced ready for
trial.

All matters in controversy, legal, equitable, and factual, remaining on this remand, were
submitted to the Court for its determination and the Court heard the evidence and arguments of
counsel.

The Court orally RENDERED judgment for Defendant, Paul Reed Harper, on Friday
August 23, 2019. This written judgment memorializes that rendition. Accordingly, the Court
RENDERS judgment for Defendant, Paul Reed Harper, as follows:

The Court GRANTS Harper's Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss") the
removal proceedings, in part; Harper's Motion to Dismiss the State's removal petition with respect
to the State's allegations based on the Open Meetings Act is DENIED.

The Court finds that the State's petition to remove Harper based on violations ofthe Texas
Open Meetings Act is moot.

The State's immunity from liability defense, which the Court finds the State asserted in the
trial court for the first time after the Supreme Court of Texas remanded this case, is OVERRULED
and DENIED in all respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under § 27.009(a)(J)
of the Texas Citizens Participation Act, Defendant's request for court costs, reasonable attorney's
fees, and other expenses incun'ed in defending against the legal action is GRANTED against the
State and Best, jointly and severally, and Defendant is awarded against the State and Best, jointly
and severally, the following amounts of court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and other expenses
which the Court finds are reasonable and justice and equity requires:

I. $227,083.00 in attorney's fees incurred to date, which the Court finds are reasonable.

2. $6,640.00 in court costs and expenses, which the Court finds are reasonable.

3. Reasonable, conditional appellate fees as follows:

• $50,000.00 in the event the State or Best appeals this matter to the Waco Court of
Appeals and Harper prevails;

• $12,000.00 in the event the State or Best seeks a petition for review from the
Supreme Court of Texas and a response is requested and Harper prevails;

• $50,000.00 in the event the Supreme Court of Texas seeks briefing on the merits
from Harper and Harper prevails;

• $15,000.00 in the event the Supreme Court of Texas grants oral argument and Harper
prevails; and

• $10,000.00 in the event Harper must respond to a motion for rehearing at the
Supreme Court of Texas by the State or Best and Harper prevails.

The foregoing conditional appellate attorney's fees represent the anticipated reasonable
and necessary attorney's fees that would be incurred by Harper in defending an appeal from this
Final Judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under § 27.009(a)(2)
of the Texas Citizens Participation Act, Harper is awarded $35,000.00 in sanctions against the
State and Best, jointly and severally, and the Court finds that both the State and Best brought the
legal action against Harper. The Court finds that $35,000.00 sanctions is sufficient to deter the
State and Best from bringing similar actions in the future.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Harper is entitled to
recover from the State and Best post judgment interest on all of the above at a rate of five and
one-quarter percent (5.25%), compounded annually, from the date this judgment is rendered until
all amounts are paid in full.

This Judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is final and appealable.

The Court orders execution to issue for this judgment as allowed by law.

Signed on this 10 day of September, 2019.
Judge Presiding - John Weeks

 


Permalink Tags:          
     Views: 694 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Why are Paul Manafort's defense attorneys helping Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman today?
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Updated: Ambulance/Emergency Vehicles and Transporting patients-where? (2019)
Turk Case Against Somervell County Hospital District and Ray Reynolds STILL Ongoing, Apparently Altered More than 3 years later- Update Feb 2019
When Local Government Possibly Violates the Texas Open Meetings Act # 3 (Somervell County)
When Local Government Possibly Violates the Texas Open Meetings Act # 2 (Somervell County)

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Wednesday, October 16, 2019






Latest Posts

Why are Paul Manafort's defense attorneys helping Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman today?
salon 10/10/2019

Money Laundering 101- Trump seeks to get rid of regulations on offshore money
salon 10/10/2019

Pete Sessions wrote letter then got lots of moolah from Republican PAC
salon 10/10/2019

So are christians accepting of Trump's actions with Turkey-slaughter of the Kurds?
salon 10/10/2019

Today In Trump's Grifterville -10/10/2019 Impeachment Edition
salon 10/10/2019

Did we elect a monarch? Bah to the Constitution? Trump and the Ukraine
salon 9/21/2019


More Blog Headlines
 



Comments

salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )








Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS

 

%>