19 October 2018 at 8:48:24 AM
Why is it that Republicans, including Donald Trump are lying and saying they are trying to protect people with pre-existing conditions when they are in federal court to KILL it?
Many GOP candidates are airing campaign ads pledging their support for preexisting condition protections and some endangered incumbents have introduced bills in Congress to ensure that the protections remain.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) reinforced the urgent GOP message in an interview with Bloomberg News this week that the GOP is able to "deal with" the attacks on health care, which has become the central issue in the midterm campaign in which control of Congress is at stake. "There's nobody in the Senate that I'm familiar with who is not in favor of coverage of preexisting conditions," McConnell said.
He's not familiar with Trump and the Republican case against it in US District Court, then. Or he's just out and out lying to fool the gullible.
1. The House effort to repeal and replace Obamacare included an amendment allowing states to request waivers that would have essentially nullified the preexisting conditions protections it promised.
2. Trump's Justice Department has refused to defend Obamacare against a lawsuit that 20 state attorneys general have brought in Texas. The GOP officials want to eliminate the ACA because a key part of it, the individual mandate -- originally intended to help pay for sick individuals to get affordable coverage -- was thrown out in last year's GOP tax overhaul.
3. Republicans are still pushing to repeal the ACA
Sabrina Corlette, a senior research fellow at Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms and a former committee aide to then-Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), called the president's claim that Republicans want to protect preexisting conditions a "baldfaced lie," referring to the administration's decision not to fight the ACA lawsuit in Texas.
"I don't want to suggest the ACA is the only exclusive way to protect people with preexisting conditions. People could come up with other policy proposals to get the same result, but they haven't," Corlette said. "Every single thing [the GOP has] come up with through the whole repeal and replace debate would have left people without coverage, paying more, or without specific benefits they need for coverage."
Congressional Republicans spent much of 2017 trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act. After a failed drive to pass a repeal bill—the American Health Care Act—they successfully voted to end the individual mandate, a key element of the law that helps stabilize health insurance markets. The Trump administration has also tried to undermine Obamacare, loosening rules, reducing outreach, slashing payments to insurers, and throwing insurance markets into chaos. And at the state level, Republican attorneys general have filed suit in an effort to abolish the law in its entirety.
Republicans still want to repeal Obamacare, but they’re telling voters the opposite. On the campaign trail, Republican candidates are stalwart defenders of the Affordable Care Act and its most popular provision: a regulation that prohibits insurers from discriminating on the basis of pre-existing conditions. More than obfuscation or spin, this is outright lying. And as they do it, Republicans are showing contempt for voters, and further fraying our ability to do electoral democracy.
In his final debate with challenger Beto O’Rourke, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz similarly pledged to protect those with pre-existing conditions. “We can protect pre-existing conditions, and you need to understand, everyone agrees we’re going to protect pre-existing conditions.” But Cruz is a front-line fighter in the war against Obamacare and has been for years. In 2013, he shut down the federal government in a drive to defund the law. During the 2016 Republican presidential primary, Cruz outlined his vision for health care with a pledge to “repeal every word of Obamacare,” offering an alternative that made no mention of patients with pre-existing conditions. This summer, when asked the lawsuit that would gut the law and those protections, Cruz defended the suit.
This is from Case # 4:18-cv-00167-O in US District Court- Northern District READ the PDF complaint and READ the answer from the states supporting ACA.
from p 16 of the argument against the Republicans who want to stop ACA.
In the ACA, “Congress addressed the problem of those who [could] not obtain insurance coverage because of pre-existing conditions or other health issues.” NFIB, 567 U.S. at 547. Congress placed new requirements on insurers that guarantee more affordable coverage regardless of health status, age, gender or geographic location. The ACA’s “guaranteed-issue” and “community-rating” provisions bar insurers from denying coverage because of medical history and from charging unhealthy individuals higher premiums than healthy individuals. NFIB, 567 U.S. at 547-48. These two provisions are important ACA consumer protections. Sherman Dec. ¶¶ 3-4, Appx. 417-418; Aaron Dec. ¶¶ 48, 55, 62, 69, 76, 83, 90, 97, 104, 111, 118, 125, 132, 139, 146, 153, 160, Appx. 026- 059. 3 And these provisions have given peace of mind to the millions of Americans with preexisting health conditions, while improving healthcare access for women, young adults, veterans, and persons with disabilities.4 Aaron Dec. ¶¶ 13-16, 26, Appx. 008-016; Isasi Dec. ¶¶ 4-5, 12, 15, ECF No. 15-2 at 7-14; Berns Dec. ¶¶ 3-6, Appx. 077-079; Corlette Dec. ¶ 9-12, 15-16, 19, 20, Appx. 087-091.
3 Key protections of the ACA that would be impacted by the requested relief include (among others); guaranteed issue (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-1); guaranteed renewability (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-2); prohibition of preexisting condition exclusions (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-3); prohibition of discrimination based on health status (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-4); prohibition on excessive waiting periods (more than 90 days) (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-11); prohibition of lifetime or annual limits (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-11); prohibition on recessions once covered (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-12); coverage of preventative health services (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13); extension of dependent coverage to 26 years of age (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-14); and the coverage of essential health benefits, including ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance abuse treatment, prescription drugs, laboratory services, preventative services and chronic disease management, and pediatric services, including oral and vision care. 42 U.S.C. § 18022. 4 Examples of preexisting conditions include cancer, diabetes, asthma, heart attack and heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, and pregnancy. See The Commonwealth Fund, “Access to Coverage and Care for People with Preexisting Conditions: How it Changed Under the ACA.” Appx. 155-161.
Here are all the people involved. Notice that the plaintiffs include: Texas, Wisconsin, Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missour, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Arkansas.
affordable health care
Latest Blog Post by salon -Why are Paul Manafort's defense attorneys helping Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman today?
More Posts You Might Enjoy
On the lawsuit Luminant against Titus County Appraisal District (Sep 2016)
Federal Lawsuit filed by Turks Against Somervell County Hospital District and Ray Reynolds
Har-De-Har-Har- Rick Perry Roundup O Day- October 13 2011
You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not
a spammer bot
Or you can login!
New poster comments are moderated,
meaning they won't show up until approved... or not. Be patient-we
have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude?
totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your
post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments
but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt
propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not
necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up
right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting
for Main Page
Saturday, October 19, 2019
Why are Paul Manafort's defense attorneys helping Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman today?
Money Laundering 101- Trump seeks to get rid of regulations on offshore money
Pete Sessions wrote letter then got lots of moolah from Republican PAC
So are christians accepting of Trump's actions with Turkey-slaughter of the Kurds?
Today In Trump's Grifterville -10/10/2019 Impeachment Edition
Did we elect a monarch? Bah to the Constitution? Trump and the Ukraine
Been awhile. Send me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run....
(What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )
I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks. I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit....
(What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )
I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood.
Is Jacene still involved? I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's....
(What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )