11 January 2018 at 11:45:11 AM
....who really does Republican tax reform help in the long run? Answer: primarily people who do not work for hourly wages and people whose income comes more from investment than it does from salary or wages. What’s more, many of the tax cuts for these people do not expire at the end of 10 years, so that for many in those categories, their annual tax savings are far beyond the total annual wages or salary of that typical American family who makes $73,000. Current breaks for people who make their living off investments were maintained and in some cases expanded, such as “carried interest” on investments that is not taxed in the year it’s earned. That’s a break the average working family, especially those with less than $400 set aside, will never see.
.... it is notuniversally accepted that tax reform and tax cuts simply generate higher growth. Look to Kansas for a catastrophic example. And tax reform that did generate higher growth, such as that under President Reagan (as the congressman accurately notes), came following a long bipartisan process. But then Reagan also raised taxes because of concerns about the deficit, which the GOP seems to conveniently forget. Congressman Flores tries to defend the tax-bill legislative process in November and December. Yet only Republicans insist this was not a rush job. And the House and Senate committees that crafted the bill did so in a process that was anything but bipartisan. In fact, the mystery and secrecy led to votes before many said they had a chance to read the whole bill, much less hold hearings on it. Consider Republican Sen. Bob Corker’s late vote switch and his supposedly learning still later last-minute additions meant real-estate investors such as him would get even bigger breaks: “I had not read it.”...
Congressman Flores insists that claims this GOP tax-reform bill will negatively impact Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security and increased deficits are “categorically false.” If so, why did follow-up stories then report House Speaker Paul Ryan and others now want to reform those very programs, beginning by calling them the pejorative term of “welfare.” The higher deficits will put pressure on the budget reconciliation processes where there are already voices crying for cutbacks in those programs to pay for higher defense spending.
Tags: glen rose somervell bill flores tax plan
Latest Blog Post by salon -Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 1/12/2018-Trump is a Racist
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 1/12/2018-Trump is a Racist
Excellent Editorial from Waco Tribune- Leave Robert Mueller Alone To Finish Investigation
Turk v Ray Reynolds and Somervell County Hospital District Lawsuit Continues -On into 2018 Update
Video- City of Glen Rose Town Council Meeting from Jan 8 2018
You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot
Or you can login!
New poster comments are moderated,
meaning they won't show up until approved... or not. Be
patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You
want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your
post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest
comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or
govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not
necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting