State of Texas Motion for Rehearing in the Harper v Best case DENIED 7/13/2016 -Paul Reed Harper v The State of Texas Ex Rel George Darrell Best


 
Paul Harper Wins... AGAIN!!! That makes THREE times

State of Texas Motion for Rehearing in the Harper v Best case DENIED 7/13/2016 -Paul Reed Harper v The State of Texas Ex Rel George Darrell Best
 


13 July 2016 at 8:05:49 PM
salon

 Appeal Opinion from the 10th Court of Appeals here where Paul Harper won. (State of Texas is represented by Andy Lucas. who put in the Motion for a Rehearing which has been denied as of today) 

 

(BOLDING, below is mine) 

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00105-CV

PAUL REED HARPER, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL GEORGE DARRELL BEST, Appellee

From the 249th District Court

Somervell County, Texas

Trial Court No. C10369

ORDER

The State of Texas has filed a motion for rehearing in this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. We requested a response. Id. 49.2. The parties’ briefing has caused us to realize that the style of the case used in the opinion and judgment does not properly reflect the parties in this proceeding. Accordingly, this order bears the proper style of the appeal. We will not, however, withdraw and re-issue the opinion or judgment based on this technical correction to a non-substantive portion of the opinion or judgment.

Further, in their role of zealous advocates, the parties have made various characterizations about our opinion and judgment and have argued about what various statements mean. We do not resolve the conflicting interpretations herein. The interpretations presented by the parties have either been decided by the judgment and are subject to review by the Texas Supreme Court or were not properly before us in the appeal because they had not been addressed by the trial court, and in our role as a reviewing court, it would not be appropriate for us to decide the issues in the first instance.

We will, however, comment on one of the conflicting interpretations because, due to the nature of the briefing, there is evidence of some confusion.

We adjudged appellate costs solely against the State of Texas and did not make the relator, George Darrel Best, jointly and severally liable for costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4. The State had not asserted sovereign immunity from liability, as opposed to immunity from suit, and we are not inclined to take that issue up on motion for rehearing. See Tex. DOT v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999) (“Like other affirmative defenses to liability, [immunity from liability] must be pleaded or else it is waived.”); Fed. Sign v. Tex. S. Univ., 951 S.W.2d 401, 405 (Tex. 1997). Nevertheless, the briefs have advocated their respective party’s position about the ability, if any, of the trial court on remand to award attorney’s fees, court cost, expenses, and sanctions against the State. We expressly decline to address this issue because the trial court has not determined what the amounts are and whether the amounts will be assessed against specific parties or whether it will be assessed jointly and severally against multiple parties. Accordingly, it would be premature, as merely an advisory opinion, for us to attempt to resolve that issue at this point in the proceeding.

The State’s motion for rehearing is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed July 13, 2016

 


Permalink Tags:          
     Views: 1197 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Finally Trump Issues an Executive Order to Fix the Mess HE Created -How Will He Fix it for the Missing Children?
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Turk v Somervell County Hospital District/Ray Reynolds Case Going to TRIAL in September 2018
Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 1/12/2018-Trump is a Racist
From Waco Trib- Have no illusions about the GOP Tax Law
Excellent Editorial from Waco Tribune- Leave Robert Mueller Alone To Finish Investigation

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



Click Here for Main Page

Latest Posts

Finally Trump Issues an Executive Order to Fix the Mess HE Created -How Will He Fix it for the Missing Children?
salon 6/20/2018

Can This Get Any Worse? Yes, Immigrant Children Claim They were Drugged (Trump's America)
salon 6/20/2018

More Fallout- American Airlines Asks to be Removed from Transporting Children
salon 6/20/2018

What is WRONG with ANY Religion that believes a god put a man like Trump in power
salon 6/20/2018

And NOW Trump's Policy Causing Children of *Tender Age* to be put in Camps
test 6/20/2018

All Trump has to do is pick up the phone about these kids and say *STOP IT*
salon 6/19/2018


More Blog Headlines
 



Comments

salon > From the Dallas Observer in 2015 Prestonwood Baptist Church and its supporters have never liked talking about the convicted pedophile who once worked there and have let that be known in very pointe.... (Prestonwood Baptist Church in Dallas Back in the News-Internet Sex Sting with Pastor)

salon > Saw this video today   (Pesky Black Buzzards)

salon > Adding a comment after Donald Trump's false equivalence of the KKK/Nazi/White Supremacy rally in Charlottesville. (Prestonwood Baptist Church in Dallas Back in the News-Internet Sex Sting with Pastor)

salon > Update on letter grading from Texas Lege May 2017 In the compromise version of the bill, schools and districts would be graded in three categories: student achievement, student progress and closi.... (Letter Grades in 2017 for Glen Rose ISD and Brazos River Charter Schools)













Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS

 

%>