Sid Miller Said That the Sonogram Bill Was Because Women Were NOT ALLOWED to View SonogramsSomervell County Salon-Glen Rose, Rainbow, Nemo, Glass....Texas


 
You Have to Listen to This!

Sid Miller Said That the Sonogram Bill Was Because Women Were NOT ALLOWED to View Sonograms
 


21 May 2011 at 8:57:11 PM
salon

I downloaded the podcast from NPR's discussion on Tell Me More with Sid Miller from about a week ago and listened to it just now. Miller says that the reason for the bill was that women who were getting abortions and had sonograms were not allowed to see the sonograms.

Rough transcription: We took hours and hours of testimony in committee and repeatedly women told us even though they had a sonogram performed and that they had paid for that and many of them had requested to view the sonogram, they were denied that right.

Let's just say that is true in some cases. First, I would assume it would not be a universal situation but probably a policy of the clinic that is performing the abortion. Miller said a number of women testified that they weren't allowed to see the sonogram. Shouldn't the bill, then, have been to set a policy that if a woman WANTED TO SEE THE SONOGRAM, she would be permitted to? Instead of FORCING women who may not want to to look at the sonogram or hear it described?

How baloney is THAT excuse. It's exactly the flip side of what is offensive about this bill. I understand that there may be women who wish to see the MANDATORY sonagram THAT THEY HAVE PAID FOR and, if denied, that's a travesty. But to FORCE women into looking or, if they won't look, to have to hear what the physician decides to tell them about what the sonogram shows is ridiculous.

Miller also says this is part of informed consent that you have with medical procedures. Um. I have never been in a situation where I had something medically done where I was forced to look at the Xray or hear it described. Never. Someone in the medical field inform me- is this a regular part of informed consent, where someone has to look at an Xray or sonogram OR is forced to sit and listen to the physician describe the procedure in lieu of say, a brochure? Suppose I go to get my teeth worked on and xrays are taken-am I required to look at the xrays before I can be treated?

Again, let's say I have a cavity in my teeth and an xtray shows that X tooth needs to be drilled. First, I have chosen to go to the dentist. I can get up and walk out or postpone getting my teeth drilled, but it's entirely my choice. I don't have to wait another day to think it over, because the dentist is treating me as an adult. The situation is even more like this: Suppose I KNOW which tooth is bothering me, the filling has come out, and an Xray would only benefit the dentist to know how far to drill. I don't need to hear or see the xray described in order to, right then and there, get done what I, as an adult, would like to get done. On the other hand, if I'm paying for the xray, and I WANT TO SEE IT, I shouldn't be denied by the dentist; but that's not forcing me to view it if I do not want to.

If this is not the case, and someone associated with the medical field can tell me that for all medical procedures, part of informed consent requires that, when xrays or sonograms are taken, the patients MUST look at them or hear them described, then please say so, along with a link to the state or federal law that requires that.

Miller and the Texas Republicans and handful of Texas Democrats who voted for this are way out of line, for other reasons we've stated before. But the baloney excuse that Miller made in the radio interview again treats people as if they aren't capable of following a logical argument. One hopes it isn't because Miller doesn't even understand this.


Permalink Tags:          
     Views: 1684 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019
More Posts You Might Enjoy
Sid Miller's Irresponsible Touting of Warfarin to Kill Feral Hogs
Some Interesting Abortion Statistics in 2014 for Somervell County
Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 1/19/2016
Ken Paxton's Nutty Wish List for Abortion for Texas Lege
Comments!  
1 - humanbeing   21 May 2011 @ 9:49:19 PM 

Miller is just another phoney...what else is new. What a coward.


Latest Blog Post by humanbeing -State Department Admits It Doesn't Know Keystone XL's Exact Route
2 - pstern   25 May 2011 @ 11:05:46 AM 

Who exactly was the responsible party in NOT permitting women to see their sonograms?  I would love to hear that one.

Miller, like so many of our officials, is little more than a con man.  He works for his special interests instead of for the people is is supposed to represent, but instead double-talks his way around the issues.

The problem is that the people permit the officials to get away with it.  If Miller was voted out of office, he couldn't keep doing what he does.

So?  The fault is with the voters AND with Miller --- and with elected officials like him.


Latest Blog Post by pstern -Who funds ISIS?
 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered? Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



     

Click Here for Main Page



Guest
Today Is  
Monday, January 20, 2020

Latest Posts


Paul Harper offered to settle State of Texas ex rel. Best v Harper lawsuit for $68k back in 2016
pharper 12/29/2019 Views 550



Video- Somervell County Commissioners Court Special Sessions (2) Dec 23 2019

salon 12/23/2019 Views 579



Top 100 Posts on Somervell County Salon for 2019

salon 12/22/2019 Views 392



Plans for Somervell County Salon Blog for 2020
salon 12/22/2019 Views 302



Imagine you were called up for jury duty and some people said they'd already made up their mind
salon 12/22/2019 Views 317



National Review on Removing Trump from Office (12/2019)
salon 12/22/2019 Views 310


More Blog Headlines








 



Comments

salon > Quick update on this, via Pacer-Click on pic to see larger (Turk Case Update- Telephone Conference Hearing Set for March 8 2019 )

salon > Lance Been awhile. Send me an email at salon@glenrose.net with the names of who you're talking about, above. Also, the newspaper editor is no longer local, ie officed here, but the paper is run.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I'd love to see the Hotel Guest books and see if Jacene's name shows up long before he officially *found* the tracks.  I'd like to know if the Visitor's Bureau has emails wit.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )

LanceHall > I see the land or that part of it is now in the hands of Glen Rose's own Corky Underwood. Is Jacene still involved?   I had already informed the Visitor Bureau manager (who's.... (What Happened to Jerry Jacene? )





Home | Blog Home | About | News | Piazza | Calendar | Audio/Video/Open Rec | Search
Write!  |profile | quotes |
top Daily | top Weekly |top Month | top Year | Top All! | archives | subscribe RSS