14 May 2009 at 9:24:47 AM
So... the nuclear power plant site at Olkiluoto (Finland) is 50 percent OVER the original budgeted price of 4 BILLION dollars to construct it. And now the sTUK, the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority is threatning to delay this and future EPR projects. I looked at the STUK site and it appears to be the counterpart, in Finland of the US NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission). Apparently STUK told Areva (which is doing the nuclear power plant) over a year ago about safety concerns and other issues.
Ironically, the EPR system is promoted by its makers as having superior safety systems compared to other nuclear reactors.
"I want to express my great concern on the lack of progress in the design of Olkiluoto 3 NPP [nuclear power plant] automation," he wrote. "Without a proper design that meets the basic principles of nuclear safety...I see no possibility to approve these important systems for installation," said the letter from Jukka Laaksonen, STUK's Director General. "The systems with highest safety importance are to be designed by Areva NP SAS but unfortunately the attitude or lack of professional knowledge of some persons who speak in the expert meetings on behalf of that organisation prevent ... progress in resolving the concerns."
The leaked letter was sent in December 2008. Areva has admitted this week that it has since sent some, but not all, of the requested documentation demanded by STUK and claims that the company will have done so by the end of June.
I know that the proposed two new reactors (that right now are NOT on the short list for corporate welfare loans) are of the type APWR (Advance Pressurized Water REactor). I wonder.. the design is NOT approved and I find it fishy that NRC is going ahead with the approval process BEFORE making sure the design is viable. But beyond that, if the NRC has found issues with the APWR, how does the public know? In the instance above, it was some kind of leaked letter from the regulatory commission. Does it take a leak for citizens to know for sure?
P.S. While I don't see where the meeting notices BEFORE the fact are, here's correspondence and public meetings related to the US-APWR Design Certification Application
Latest Blog Post by salon -How is what Google did in Midlothian Texas transparent?
More Posts You Might Enjoy
What About Those Mitsubishi Nuclear Reactors That EFH/Luminant Wants for Comanche Peak?
Joint Venture Between Luminant and Mitsubishi for Comanche Peak in Glen Rose (Somervell Co)
You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not
a spammer bot
Or you can login!
New poster comments are moderated,
meaning they won't show up until approved... or not. Be patient-we
have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude?
totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your
post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments
but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt
propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not
necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up
right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting