Really? Griping abut Rand Paul's Filibuster?
 


7 March 2013 at 2:58:57 PM
salon

I saw today that some people were complaining and poking fun at Rand Paul for his talking filibuster yesterday. Paul was making a point about how the Obama administration needed to clarify that it would not use unmanned drones to killl American citizens on our own soil. I see nothing wrong with that, and would much rather have the type of filibuster where someone gets up and TALKS instead of places a hold on a bill. Now, I didn't agree with everything Paul was saying during that marathon and some of it seemed a little peevish and paranoid, but I completely support his right to say what he thinks. As one of the Supreme Court justices said, the answer to bad speech is MORE speech. So those people who don't like Rand Paul on principle or because he's a member one the Republican party should still, in my book, salute him for bringing his concerns out in the open instead of, as so many in Congress do, keeping them behind closed doors.

P.S. Here's Eric Holder's answer to this.

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: "Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" Holder wrote. "The answer to that question is no."


Permalink
     Views: 832 
Latest Blog Post by salon -Video- Pam Parsons on Customer Service, Personnel at Glen Rose Medical Center

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You are posting anonymously
(After sending, your comment is held pending approval)

Name:        -Anonymous comments are always moderated
Email:        -Required but your email will not show
Comment:
 

Or you can login!

LOGON - Name:Password:

 Not registered?

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



Click Here for Main Page



Latest Posts

Video- Pam Parsons on Customer Service, Personnel at Glen Rose Medical Center
salon 9/25/2016

On the lawsuit Luminant against Titus County Appraisal District (Sep 2016)
salon 9/24/2016

Dr Davis Excused from being on-call due to his age Glen Rose Medical Center
salon 9/24/2016

Anybody know if the nursing home is actually going to build a laundry on land GRMC sold? Anybody?
salon 9/24/2016

Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 9/23/2016
salon 9/23/2016

Update 9/23/2016 on Turk v Ray Reynolds and Somervell County Hospital District
salon 9/23/2016




Comments

salon > @Jerry Lee. You know, when I went in to do an open records request, I figured since it was a public filing at CAD, I'd be able to see it. Big nope. Supposedly, however, EFH or Luminant or somebody.... (What Does an open records request look like where most info is redacted? Luminant Protest at Somervell CAD)

jerry lee thanks,  if your goverment--or--you have lawyer money, there are no rules until someone has the time , talent, and is willing to do the work .  to said wait a minute! I'm the taxpayer what do you mean.... (What Does an open records request look like where most info is redacted? Luminant Protest at Somervell CAD)

salon > Followup of video from 9/13/2016 City of Glen Rose meeting. (Danny Chambers Letter Cutting $58,000 Paid to City for Animal Control)

salon > @Charlie. Thank you. I prefer secular government meetings, no doubt about it, but local government does have the right, according to the Supreme Court Town of Greece v Galloway, to have invocations, a.... (Somervell County Judge Danny Chambers Continues to Show Contempt for the Constitution (9/12/2016) )