Really? Griping abut Rand Paul's Filibuster?
 


7 March 2013 at 2:58:57 PM
salon

I saw today that some people were complaining and poking fun at Rand Paul for his talking filibuster yesterday. Paul was making a point about how the Obama administration needed to clarify that it would not use unmanned drones to killl American citizens on our own soil. I see nothing wrong with that, and would much rather have the type of filibuster where someone gets up and TALKS instead of places a hold on a bill. Now, I didn't agree with everything Paul was saying during that marathon and some of it seemed a little peevish and paranoid, but I completely support his right to say what he thinks. As one of the Supreme Court justices said, the answer to bad speech is MORE speech. So those people who don't like Rand Paul on principle or because he's a member one the Republican party should still, in my book, salute him for bringing his concerns out in the open instead of, as so many in Congress do, keeping them behind closed doors.

P.S. Here's Eric Holder's answer to this.

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: "Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" Holder wrote. "The answer to that question is no."


Permalink
     Views: 847 
Latest Blog Post by salon -I LOVE this secular holiday time of year- Thanksgiving and Xmas and New Years

 You! Leave a Comment! You Know you Want To!
You must be a registered member to comment on the blog.
Your first post is held pending approval to make sure you're not a spammer bot

 Not registered?

New poster comments are moderated, meaning they won't show up until approved... or not.  Be patient-we have lives outside this blog, so it might take awhile You want to be rude? totally stupid? inappropriate? Racist? Bigoted? Flame war baiter? Your post may be deleted. Spammers or people posting pretend interest comments but really wanting to hawk their latest book or sell stuff or govt propaganda flacks won't see their posts published. Comments do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the site owner(salon).
If you have a problem with logging in or registering, please speak up right away. Love your comments. Oh, except spammers
More on commenting



Click Here for Main Page



Latest Posts

I LOVE this secular holiday time of year- Thanksgiving and Xmas and New Years
salon 11/25/2016

Ruminations of the Easily Amused for 11/21/2016
salon 11/21/2016

Post Mortem Reflections on the 2016 Election-Who'd You Vote for? Part 2
salon 11/20/2016

Laugh O Day- Remember When Rick Perry Couldn't Remember the 3rd federal agency he would abolish??
salon 11/17/2016

Post Mortem Reflections on the 2016 Election-Who'd You Vote for? Part 1
salon 11/16/2016

Speaking of Public Information, here are Somervell County Hospital District Videos for October 2016
salon 11/16/2016




Comments

salon > @Sassy wonder why. If you know, email me  (GRMC Employee Spent Stolen Church Money on $20,000 Florida Vacation)

Sassy She just got fired from Cheyne Eye Center in Granbury this morning! She had been employed by them for about 2 months.  (GRMC Employee Spent Stolen Church Money on $20,000 Florida Vacation)

Debbie Ackley Omg I don't know who is reading about this case then posting answers that should be made up off of some Alfred Hitchcock movie. First of all it was the big man Darin that said he slept upstairs with D.... (Silly String Over Your Child's Grave-Darlie Routier Case More Testing)

PDiddie Well said.  I agree with (almost) every word.  Your rationale about her server is particularly apt and not one I had seen expressed so well anywhere else. (Post Mortem Reflections on the 2016 Election-Who'd You Vote for? Part 1)